Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025). Julio- Diciembre 2025: Revista Multidisciplinaria Investigación Contemporánea
Ciencias Sociales- Artículo de Revisión

Revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de fiabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación para la Demencia Frontotemporal

DOI: 10.58995/redlic.rmic.v3.n2.a114
  • Andrés Alexis Ramírez Coronel,
  • Pedro Andrés Muñoz Arteaga,
  • Jessica Vanessa Quito Calle ,
  • Sofia Carolina Vintimilla Guillén
Andrés Alexis Ramírez Coronel
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana
Jessica Vanessa Quito Calle
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana
Sofia Carolina Vintimilla Guillén
Universidad del Salvador

Abstract

Introduction: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a progressive form of dementia that affects behavior and cognitive function. Assessing knowledge about this disease is crucial for proper diagnosis and treatment. Various assessment instruments have been adapted and validated in different cultural contexts, but their reliability varies. Objective: To analyze the scientific literature on assessment tools used to measure knowledge and progression of FTD, with the aim of conducting a meta-analysis of reliability, focusing on Cronbach's alpha in different cultural adaptations and contexts. Methodology: Four scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and PubMed) were reviewed to gather information on the reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) of FTD assessment tools in diverse populations. Data on the population, validation method, cultural context, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) of each instrument were collected. Results: The findings showed that the internal consistency of the instruments varies by context. For instance, the FTDKS scored a Cronbach’s alpha of .846 in the United States, .740 in Spanish-speaking countries, and .800 in Poland. The FTD-FRS showed an exceptional alpha of .975 in Brazil. The meta-analysis model (nStudies = 3) demonstrated an overall reliability of .85 (CIα = .80-.90). Conclusion: FTD assessment tools exhibit reliability variations depending on the cultural context. Proper adaptations are essential to improve their effectiveness in assessing knowledge about the disease, thereby facilitating better diagnosis and patient care.

artículo en pdf (Spanish) artículo en html (Spanish) Flipbook (Spanish)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bang J, Spina S, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet. 2015; 24;386(10004):1672–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00461-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00461-4
  2. Bott NT, Radke A, Stephens ML, Kramer JH. Frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, deficits and management. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(6):439–54. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.14.34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.14.34
  3. Young JJ, Lavakumar M, Tampi D, Balachandran S, Tampi RR. Frontotemporal dementia: latest evidence and clinical implications. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jan;8(1):33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125317739818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125317739818
  4. Hogan DB, Jetté N, Fiest KM, Roberts JI, Pearson D, Smith EE. The prevalence and incidence of frontotemporal dementia: a systematic review. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Apr;43(Suppl 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.25
  5. Mendez MF, Shapira JS, McMurtray A, Licht E, Miller BL. Accuracy of the clinical evaluation for frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(6):830–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.64.6.830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.64.6.830
  6. Leroy M, Bertoux M, Skrobala E, Mode E, Adnet-Bonte C, Le Ber I. Characteristics and progression of patients with frontotemporal dementia in a regional memory clinic network. Alz Res Therapy. 2021;13:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00753-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00753-9
  7. Cahill S, Pierce M, Werner P, Darley A, Bobersky A. A systematic review of the public’s knowledge and understanding of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015;29(3):255–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000102
  8. Leszko M, Carpenter BD. Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Alzheimer’s disease knowledge scale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(1):51–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000514872
  9. Lüdecke D, von dem Knesebeck O, Kofahl C. Public knowledge about dementia in Germany – results of a population survey. Int J Public Health. 2016;61(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0703-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0703-x
  10. Pose M, Cetkovich M, Gleichgerrcht E, Ibáñez A, Torralva T, Manes F. The overlap of symptomatic dimensions between frontotemporal dementia and several psychiatric disorders that appear in late adulthood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25(2):159–67. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2013.769939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2013.769939
  11. Finger EC. Frontotemporal dementias. Continuum. 2016 Apr;22(2 Dementia):464–89. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000300
  12. Caceres BA, Frank MO, Jun J, Martelly MT, Sadarangani T, de Sales PC. Family caregivers of patients with frontotemporal dementia: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Mar;55:71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.016
  13. O’Keeffe FM, Murray B, Coen RF, Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA, Garavan H. Loss of insight in frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain. 2007 Mar;130(Pt 3):753–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl367
  14. Ducharme S, Dols A, Laforce R, Devenney E, Kumfor F, van den Stock J. Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders. Brain. 2020;1;143(6):1632–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa018
  15. Wynn MJ, Carpenter BD. Frontotemporal dementia knowledge scale: development and preliminary psychometric properties. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020;34(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000344
  16. Leszko M, Zając-Lamparska L, Trempala J. Aging in Poland. Gerontologist. 2015;55(5):707–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu171
  17. Carvalho A, Rea IM, Parimon T, Cusack BJ. Physical activity and cognitive function in individuals over 60 years of age: A systematic review. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2014;9:661–82. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S55520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S55520
  18. Casaletto KB, Rentería MA, Pa J, Tom SE, Harrati A, Armstrong NM, Rajan KB, Mungas D, Walters S, Kramer J, Zahodne LB. Late-life physical and cognitive activities independently contribute to brain and cognitive resilience. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD. 2020;74(1):363–76. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-191114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-191114
  19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
  21. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, Koffel JB; PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
  22. Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. et al. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5, 210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
  23. Cho E. Neither Cronbach’s Alpha nor McDonald’s Omega: A Commentary on Sijtsma and Pfadt. Psychometrika. 2021;86:877–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09801-1
  24. Barchard KA, Hakstian AR. The Effects of Sampling Model on Inference with Coefficient Alpha. Educ Psychol Meas. 1997;57(6):893–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006001
  25. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
  26. Wynn JC, Carpenter BD. Frontotemporal Dementia Knowledge Scale: Development and preliminary psychometric properties. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020;34(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000344
  27. Magrath-Guimet M, Martínez-Acosta F, Romero-López A. Spanish version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Knowledge Scale: Adaptation and validation. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(2):134–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0550
  28. Turró-Garriga O, Bruna-Bosch X, Gutiérrez-Villarreal M. Adaptation and validation of a Spanish-language version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS). Neurologia. 2017;32(6):386–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2015.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2015.12.002
  29. Karasiewicz K, Leszko M. Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Frontotemporal Dementia Knowledge Scale. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(1):123–34. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000521143
  30. Lima-Silva TB, Ortega-Muñoz P, Rentería-Palma C. Validity and reliability of the Frontotemporal Dementia Rating Scale (FTD-FRS) for the progression and staging of dementia in Brazilian patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2018;32(4):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000246
artículo en pdf (Spanish) artículo en html (Spanish) Flipbook (Spanish)

Published 2025-04-15

Keywords

  • metaanálisis,
  • fiabilidad,
  • psicometría,
  • demencia frontotemporal

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025). Julio- Diciembre 2025: Revista Multidisciplinaria Investigación Contemporánea

Section

Ciencias Sociales- Artículo de Revisión

Copyright (c) 2025 Los autores que publiquen en la revista Multidisciplinaria Investigación Contemporánea aceptan los siguientes términos: 1. Los autores mantienen sus derechos de autor (copyright) y otorgan a la revista Multidisciplinaria Investigación Contemporánea el derecho de la primera publicación de su trabajo, bajo una licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Esta licencia permite que terceros utilicen el contenido publicado, siempre que se mencione la autoría y la primera publicación en esta revista. 2. Los autores pueden establecer acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada de su artículo en otros lugares, como repositorios institucionales, siempre y cuando se indique claramente que el trabajo fue publicado por primera vez en esta revista. 3. Los autores conservan sus derechos de autor (copyright) y garantizan a la revista Multidisciplinaria Investigación Contemporánea el derecho a publicar el manuscrito a través de los canales que considere apropiados. 4. Se permite y se recomienda a los autores compartir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o páginas web personales), una vez que el manuscrito haya sido aceptado para su publicación. Esto puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida citación del trabajo publicado.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ramírez Coronel, A. A., Muñoz Arteaga, P. A. ., Quito Calle , J. V. . ., & Vintimilla Guillén, S. C. . (2025). Revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de fiabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación para la Demencia Frontotemporal. Contemporary Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.58995/redlic.rmic.v3.n2.a114
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.